// BLOOD TESTS
InsideTracker vs Function Health: Which Blood Test Platform Is Best for 2024?
Blood testing has evolved beyond annual physicals, with platforms like InsideTracker and Function Health offering comprehensive biomarker analysis to optimize health and performance. Both services provide direct-to-consumer lab testing, but they approach health optimization from different angles and serve distinct user needs. InsideTracker focuses on performance optimization through personalized nutrition and lifestyle recommendations based on blood biomarkers and genetic data. Founded in 2013, it integrates with wearables and provides actionable insights for athletes and health enthusiasts. Function Health, launched in 2023 under Dr. Mark Hyman's guidance, takes a more comprehensive preventive approach, offering extensive biomarker panels designed for early disease detection and overall health assessment.
InsideTracker
$589
Function Health
$499
[FEATURE COMPARISON]
| Feature | InsideTracker | Function Health |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Biomarkers Total blood markers analyzed in standard testing panel |
26-48 biomarkers (depending on plan) | 100+ biomarkers (comprehensive panel) |
|
Primary Focus Main health optimization approach and target audience |
Performance optimization and personalized nutrition | Early disease detection and preventive health screening |
|
Data Integration Ability to integrate external health data and existing test results |
Full wearable integration, can upload existing blood work | Limited integration, closed system approach |
|
Genetic Testing DNA analysis capabilities and genetic insights provided |
Optional DNA kit with 20,000+ genetic markers ($249 add-on) | Basic genetic markers included (APOE, MTHFR, LPA) |
|
Actionable Recommendations Quality and specificity of health improvement guidance |
Highly personalized nutrition and supplement plans with impact scores | Doctor-reviewed insights with general health recommendations |
|
Testing Frequency Number of blood draws included in annual membership |
2-4 tests per year (plan dependent) | 2 tests per year (initial + follow-up at 3-6 months) |
|
Mobile Blood Draw At-home blood collection service availability |
Available in select locations ($119 add-on) | Not currently available |
[PROS & CONS]
InsideTracker
Pros
- Highly actionable nutrition and supplement recommendations with impact scores
- Full wearable integration and ability to upload existing blood work
- Comprehensive genetic testing option with 20,000+ markers
- User-friendly interface with goal-based health optimization
- More flexible pricing with subscription options
Cons
- Fewer total biomarkers tested (26-48 vs 100+)
- Limited availability of mobile blood draws
- Higher cost for comprehensive testing with add-ons
Function Health
Pros
- Most comprehensive biomarker panel (100+ tests) available to consumers
- Doctor-reviewed insights and clinical-grade analysis
- Excellent for early disease detection and preventive screening
- Competitive annual pricing at $499 with two tests included
- Led by respected functional medicine expert Dr. Mark Hyman
Cons
- Limited data integration and closed system approach
- Less actionable recommendations compared to InsideTracker
- Still in beta phase with potential platform changes
- No mobile blood draw options currently available
[OUR VERDICT]
InsideTracker wins for performance optimization and actionable insights, while Function Health excels for comprehensive health screening and early disease detection.
The choice between InsideTracker and Function Health depends on your primary health goals and data preferences. Function Health excels as a comprehensive health screening tool, offering the most extensive biomarker panel available to consumers with over 100 tests. Its strength lies in early disease detection and providing a complete picture of your current health status. The platform is ideal for users who want thorough preventive screening and are willing to pay for the most comprehensive testing available.
InsideTracker stands out for users focused on performance optimization and actionable health improvements. Its integration with wearables, ability to upload existing blood work, and highly personalized nutrition recommendations make it superior for ongoing health optimization. The platform's strength is translating data into specific, measurable actions with impact scores that help prioritize interventions.
For most users seeking practical health optimization, InsideTracker offers better value through its actionable insights, data integration capabilities, and flexible testing options. However, Function Health is the clear winner for comprehensive health screening and early disease detection. The platform's extensive biomarker coverage and clinical-grade analysis make it invaluable for users with specific health concerns or those wanting the most thorough health assessment possible.
Consider InsideTracker if you're an athlete, have existing health data to integrate, or want specific nutrition and performance guidance. Choose Function Health if you prioritize comprehensive screening, have limited previous testing, or want the most extensive biomarker analysis for preventive health management.
Track InsideTracker and Function Health in BodyOS
Connect your devices to see unified insights in one place.
[RELATED COMPARISONS]
Blood Tests
SiPhox Health vs Everlywell: Complete Blood Test Comparison Guide 2024
SiPhox Health wins with superior biomarker coverage, advanced cardiovascular metrics, and comprehensive health optimization features for serious wellness tracking.
Blood Tests
InsideTracker vs Marek Health: Complete Blood Testing Comparison 2025
InsideTracker is better for comprehensive health tracking and data integration, while Marek Health excels in hormone optimization with medical supervision.
Blood Tests
Marek Health vs Function Health: Complete Blood Test Comparison 2025
Function Health wins for most users due to superior value, comprehensive testing, and accessibility, while Marek Health serves those needing specialized hormone optimization.