// WEARABLES
Amazfit GTR 4 vs Garmin Venu Sq 2: Complete Smartwatch Comparison Guide
The fitness wearable market offers compelling choices at different price points, and the Amazfit GTR 4 ($199) versus Garmin Venu Sq 2 ($249) comparison represents a classic battle between value and brand premium. Both smartwatches target health-conscious users seeking comprehensive fitness tracking, but they take distinctly different approaches to design, features, and ecosystem integration. The Amazfit GTR 4 positions itself as a feature-rich option with a traditional round display and extended battery life, while the Garmin Venu Sq 2 leverages the brand's reputation for fitness accuracy with its distinctive square design and robust health monitoring capabilities. Understanding these differences is crucial for BodyOS users who want to optimize their health tracking without compromising on essential features or breaking their budget.
Amazfit GTR 4
by Amazfit
$199
Garmin Venu Sq 2
by Garmin
$249
[FEATURE COMPARISON]
| Feature | Amazfit GTR 4 | Garmin Venu Sq 2 |
|---|---|---|
|
Display Quality & Size Screen size, resolution, and display technology affecting visibility and user experience |
1.43" AMOLED, 466×466px, 326 PPI | 1.41" AMOLED, 320×360px, 341 PPI |
|
Battery Life Real-world usage time between charges for typical fitness tracking scenarios |
Up to 14 days typical use | Up to 11 days typical use |
|
Health Sensors Available biometric monitoring capabilities for comprehensive health tracking |
Heart rate, SpO2, stress, barometer | Heart rate, SpO2, stress, no barometer |
|
GPS & Navigation Satellite connectivity and positioning accuracy for outdoor activities |
Dual-band GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, ANT+ |
|
Smart Features Connectivity options and smart device integration capabilities |
Wi-Fi, Bluetooth calls, voice commands, Alexa | No Wi-Fi, NFC payments, Garmin Connect IQ |
|
Build Quality & Design Materials, water resistance, and overall construction durability |
Aluminum alloy, 5ATM, circular design, 34g | Fiber-reinforced polymer, 5ATM, square design, 38g |
|
Fitness Tracking Available workout modes and activity monitoring capabilities |
150+ sports modes, sleep tracking, stress monitoring | 25+ sports modes, advanced sleep analysis, Body Battery |
[PROS & CONS]
Amazfit GTR 4
Pros
- 21% longer battery life (14 vs 11 days)
- Larger, higher-resolution circular display
- Wi-Fi connectivity and Bluetooth calling
- Barometric sensor for elevation tracking
- 150+ sports modes vs 25+
- $50 lower price point
Cons
- No NFC payments support
- Less accurate heart rate during intense workouts
- Weaker third-party app ecosystem
Garmin Venu Sq 2
Pros
- Gorilla Glass 3 screen protection
- NFC contactless payments
- Superior Garmin Connect ecosystem
- More accurate fitness metrics
- Body Battery energy management
- ANT+ sensor compatibility
Cons
- Shorter battery life (11 days)
- No Wi-Fi connectivity
- Smaller display resolution
- $50 higher price
- Limited sports modes (25+)
[OUR VERDICT]
The Amazfit GTR 4 wins with superior battery life, larger display, and better value, making it ideal for comprehensive health tracking.
The Amazfit GTR 4 emerges as the superior choice for most users seeking comprehensive health optimization at an attractive price point. Its 14-day battery life significantly outperforms the Venu Sq 2's 11 days, reducing charging frequency and ensuring consistent health monitoring. The larger, higher-resolution circular display (466×466px vs 320×360px) provides better readability for health metrics and workout data, while the inclusion of Wi-Fi connectivity and Bluetooth calling adds practical smart features that enhance daily usability.
From a health tracking perspective, the GTR 4's barometric sensor gives it an edge in elevation tracking and weather prediction, valuable for outdoor fitness enthusiasts. The dual-band GPS system also provides superior positioning accuracy compared to the Venu Sq 2's standard GPS implementation. However, the Garmin device counters with its renowned fitness ecosystem, offering more accurate heart rate monitoring during high-intensity workouts and the excellent Body Battery energy management feature that helps users optimize recovery.
The $50 price difference becomes significant when considering the GTR 4's broader feature set, including 150+ sports modes versus 25+ on the Venu Sq 2. For BodyOS users prioritizing comprehensive health data collection, the GTR 4's superior battery life means more consistent biometric monitoring, which translates to better long-term health insights and optimization opportunities.
While the Garmin Venu Sq 2 offers superior build quality with Gorilla Glass protection and the trusted Garmin Connect ecosystem, the Amazfit GTR 4 delivers better overall value for health-focused users who want premium features without the premium price tag.
Our pick:
Amazfit GTR 4
Track Amazfit GTR 4 and Garmin Venu Sq 2 in BodyOS
Connect your devices to see unified insights in one place.
[RELATED COMPARISONS]
Wearables
Garmin Forerunner 965 vs Coros Pace 3: Premium vs Budget Running Watch Comparison
The Coros Pace 3 offers better value for dedicated runners, while the Garmin Forerunner 965 justifies its premium price for users wanting comprehensive smartwatch features.
Wearables
Fitbit Sense 2 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 7: Ultimate Health Smartwatch Comparison
Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 wins with its superior smartwatch features and comprehensive health tracking, though Fitbit Sense 2 remains best for specialized wellness monitoring.
Wearables
Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs Garmin Fenix 8: Ultimate Adventure Smartwatch Comparison
Apple Watch Ultra 2 wins for iPhone users prioritizing smart features and daily integration, while Garmin Fenix 8 dominates for serious athletes needing maximum battery life and advanced training analytics.