// WEARABLES
Samsung Galaxy Ring vs Oura Ring Gen 3: Complete Smart Ring Comparison
The smart ring market has exploded with two major players leading the charge: Samsung's new Galaxy Ring and the established Oura Ring Gen 3. Both devices promise comprehensive health tracking in a sleek, wearable form factor that won't interrupt your daily activities like bulky smartwatches might. These rings monitor sleep quality, heart rate, activity levels, and stress patterns while providing AI-powered insights to optimize your health. While both rings share similar core functionality, they target different user bases and ecosystems. The Samsung Galaxy Ring integrates seamlessly with Android devices and offers innovative features like gesture controls and a unique charging case. The Oura Ring Gen 3, meanwhile, has years of refinement behind it, works with both iOS and Android, and provides more detailed health analytics through its subscription-based app. Understanding these key differences is crucial for choosing the right smart ring for your health optimization journey.
Samsung Galaxy Ring
by Samsung Watch
$399
[FEATURE COMPARISON]
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy Ring | Oura Ring Gen 3 |
|---|---|---|
|
Design & Comfort Physical dimensions, weight, and wearability during daily activities |
7mm wide, 2.6mm thick, 2.3-3.0g weight, concave titanium design | 7.9mm wide, 2.55mm thick, 4-6g weight, convex titanium design with multiple styles |
|
Battery Life How long the ring lasts between charges and charging convenience |
5-7 days (size dependent), wireless charging case with 1.5x backup power | 4-7 days, traditional charging dock requiring power adapter |
|
Platform Compatibility Which smartphones and operating systems are supported |
Android only, best with Samsung Galaxy phones for exclusive features | iOS and Android compatible with full feature parity across platforms |
|
Sleep Tracking Accuracy Precision in detecting sleep/wake states and sleep stage analysis |
Good accuracy with faster data sync, includes snoring detection and body temperature | Superior accuracy in detecting wake/sleep transitions, more precise sleep stage analysis |
|
Health Sensors Types and capabilities of built-in health monitoring sensors |
PPG heart rate, SpO2, skin temperature, accelerometer, gesture detection | PPG heart rate, SpO2, skin temperature, accelerometer, infrared sensor for alignment |
|
App Experience & AI Quality of companion app, data presentation, and AI-powered insights |
Samsung Health integration, Energy Score, basic AI wellness tips (Galaxy phones) | Dedicated Oura app with Readiness/Sleep/Activity scores, advanced AI Advisor chatbot |
|
Activity Tracking Number and types of workouts automatically detected |
2 automatic activities (walking, running), manual workout tracking available | 40+ automatic activity detection, comprehensive workout analysis |
|
Pricing Model Upfront cost and ongoing subscription requirements |
$399 one-time purchase, no subscription fees | $299-$549 upfront + $5.99/month subscription for advanced features |
[PROS & CONS]
Samsung Galaxy Ring
Pros
- Lighter, more comfortable concave design
- Innovative charging case with backup battery
- No subscription fees required
- Gesture controls for Samsung phones
- Built-in Find My Ring feature
Cons
- Android-only compatibility
- Limited automatic activity tracking (only 2 types)
- Less accurate sleep tracking than competitors
- Higher upfront cost at $399
Oura Ring Gen 3
Pros
- Superior sleep tracking accuracy
- Cross-platform iOS and Android support
- Comprehensive app with advanced AI insights
- 40+ automatic activity detection
- Lower starting price at $299
- Years of software refinement
Cons
- Heavier, bulkier design
- Requires $5.99/month subscription for full features
- Traditional charging dock less convenient
- More expensive over time with subscription costs
[OUR VERDICT]
Oura Ring Gen 3 wins for comprehensive health tracking accuracy and app sophistication, while Samsung Galaxy Ring excels in hardware design and value for Samsung ecosystem users.
The Samsung Galaxy Ring vs Oura Ring comparison reveals two distinct approaches to smart ring technology. Samsung has created a more refined hardware experience with its lighter, more comfortable design and innovative charging case that provides backup power on-the-go. The Galaxy Ring's concave design and reduced weight make it significantly more comfortable for extended wear, and features like gesture controls and 'Find My Ring' add practical value for Samsung ecosystem users.
However, Oura maintains its edge in software sophistication and health tracking accuracy. The Oura app provides more comprehensive health insights with its three-score system (Readiness, Sleep, Activity) and the AI Advisor offers genuinely useful personalized recommendations. Crucially, Oura's sleep tracking accuracy is notably superior, with better detection of wake/sleep transitions and more precise sleep stage analysis - critical for users serious about sleep optimization.
The decision ultimately comes down to your priorities and device ecosystem. iPhone users have no choice but Oura, while Android users must weigh the Galaxy Ring's superior hardware comfort and no-subscription model against Oura's more mature software and broader compatibility. For serious health tracking enthusiasts who want the most accurate data and comprehensive insights, Oura remains the gold standard despite its subscription cost.
For users seeking a more casual health tracking experience with excellent hardware design and no ongoing fees, the Samsung Galaxy Ring offers compelling value, especially within the Samsung ecosystem where exclusive features like gesture controls truly shine.
Our pick:
Oura Ring Gen 3
Track Samsung Galaxy Ring and Oura Ring Gen 3 in BodyOS
Connect your devices to see unified insights in one place.
[RELATED COMPARISONS]
Wearables
Fitbit Sense 2 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 7: Ultimate Health Smartwatch Comparison
Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 wins with its superior smartwatch features and comprehensive health tracking, though Fitbit Sense 2 remains best for specialized wellness monitoring.
Wearables
Garmin Forerunner 965 vs Coros Pace 3: Premium vs Budget Running Watch Comparison
The Coros Pace 3 offers better value for dedicated runners, while the Garmin Forerunner 965 justifies its premium price for users wanting comprehensive smartwatch features.
Wearables
Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs Garmin Fenix 8: Ultimate Adventure Smartwatch Comparison
Apple Watch Ultra 2 wins for iPhone users prioritizing smart features and daily integration, while Garmin Fenix 8 dominates for serious athletes needing maximum battery life and advanced training analytics.