// CGM DEVICES
Levels vs Nutrisense CGM: Complete 2024 Comparison Guide
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has evolved beyond diabetes management into a powerful tool for optimizing metabolic health. Two leading platforms, Levels and Nutrisense, offer consumer-focused CGM programs that help track how food, exercise, stress, and sleep impact blood sugar levels. Both use FDA-approved sensors like the Dexcom G6 and FreeStyle Libre to provide real-time glucose data through user-friendly mobile apps. While both platforms share the core goal of improving metabolic health through glucose insights, they take distinctly different approaches. Levels emphasizes simplicity and self-directed optimization with basic analytics and optional lab testing. Nutrisense positions itself as a comprehensive metabolic health program, featuring advanced analytics, integrated nutrition tracking, and personalized support from registered dietitians. Understanding these differences is crucial for choosing the platform that best aligns with your health optimization goals and budget.
Levels
$199
Nutrisense
$225
[FEATURE COMPARISON]
| Feature | Levels | Nutrisense |
|---|---|---|
|
Monthly Cost Regular monthly subscription pricing for CGM sensors and app access |
$199/month + $199 annual app fee | $151-209/month (volume discounts available) |
|
Expert Support Access to qualified nutrition professionals for guidance and coaching |
Optional third-party nutritionist support (additional fee) | 1:1 insurance-covered video calls with glucose-trained RDs |
|
Analytics Depth Sophistication of data analysis and insights provided by the platform |
Basic glucose scoring with spike analysis | Advanced analytics with experiments and trend analysis |
|
Sensor Compatibility Which CGM devices work with each platform |
Dexcom G6, FreeStyle Libre | Dexcom G6 (iOS), FreeStyle Libre (all platforms) |
|
Device Integration Third-party fitness and health device compatibility |
Apple Health integration only | Apple Health, Garmin, Oura, Fitbit, Keto-Mojo |
|
In-App Features Core functionality available within the mobile application |
Basic logging, meal comparison, Apple Health sync | In-app scanning, macro tracking, educational courses |
|
Lab Testing Additional metabolic health testing options beyond glucose monitoring |
At-home metabolic panel ($149) | Not offered (focuses on CGM data interpretation) |
[PROS & CONS]
Levels
Pros
- Simple, intuitive interface ideal for beginners
- Optional at-home metabolic lab panel testing
- Supports both major CGM sensors (Dexcom G6, FreeStyle Libre)
- Clean, straightforward glucose scoring system
Cons
- Basic analytics with limited insights
- No sensor calibration for FreeStyle Libre users
- Limited third-party device integration
- Annual app fee adds to total cost
Nutrisense
Pros
- Insurance-covered video calls with glucose-trained registered dietitians
- Advanced analytics with comprehensive trend analysis
- Extensive device integration (Oura, Garmin, Fitbit, Apple Health)
- In-app sensor scanning and macro tracking capabilities
- Educational courses and member community support
Cons
- No Dexcom G6 support on Android devices
- Higher pricing on shorter-term plans
- No additional lab testing options
[OUR VERDICT]
Nutrisense wins with superior expert support, advanced analytics, and comprehensive device integration, making it the better choice for serious metabolic health optimization.
After extensive analysis, Nutrisense emerges as the superior choice for most users seeking comprehensive metabolic health optimization. The platform's strength lies in its holistic approach, combining advanced analytics with personalized expert guidance from glucose-trained registered dietitians. The insurance-covered video call support provides invaluable interpretation of CGM data, helping users translate raw glucose numbers into actionable lifestyle changes. This expert guidance is particularly crucial for CGM newcomers who may struggle to understand what their data means without professional context.
Nutrisense also excels in technical capabilities, offering superior device integration with popular fitness trackers like Oura, Garmin, and Fitbit, plus advanced features like in-app sensor scanning and comprehensive macro tracking. The platform's educational resources, including in-app courses and member communities, create a supportive ecosystem for sustained behavior change. While the pricing can be higher than Levels depending on the plan chosen, the volume discounts and included dietitian support often provide better overall value.
Levels may appeal to users who prefer a simpler, more self-directed approach and value the optional at-home lab testing. However, its basic analytics and limited third-party integrations make it less compelling for users seeking comprehensive insights. The annual fee structure also adds complexity to the total cost calculation.
For serious metabolic health optimization, Nutrisense's combination of advanced technology, expert support, and comprehensive feature set justifies the investment. The platform is particularly well-suited for users new to CGM technology, those with specific health goals requiring professional guidance, and individuals who want the most comprehensive glucose monitoring experience available.
Our pick:
Nutrisense
Track Levels and Nutrisense in BodyOS
Connect your devices to see unified insights in one place.
[RELATED COMPARISONS]
CGM Devices
Levels vs Dexcom Stelo: Complete CGM Program Comparison for Metabolic Health
Dexcom Stelo wins for most users due to its over-the-counter accessibility, lower cost, and sufficient educational features for metabolic health insights.
CGM Devices
Dexcom G7 vs FreeStyle Libre 3: Complete CGM Comparison 2024
Dexcom G7 wins due to superior safety features, extensive pump integration, better insurance coverage, and predictive alerts that the Libre 3 lacks.
CGM Devices
FreeStyle Libre 3 vs Abbott Lingo: Complete CGM Comparison Guide for Health Optimization
FreeStyle Libre 3 wins for serious health optimization due to superior accuracy, clinical validation, and comprehensive glucose range detection.