// SUPPLEMENTS
AG1 vs LMNT: Complete Supplement Comparison Guide 2024
AG1 and LMNT represent two fundamentally different approaches to daily supplementation, yet both are popular choices among health-conscious individuals and athletes. AG1 (formerly Athletic Greens) is a comprehensive all-in-one greens powder containing 75 vitamins, minerals, and whole food ingredients designed to fill nutritional gaps in one daily scoop. LMNT, on the other hand, is a targeted electrolyte drink mix focused specifically on hydration and electrolyte balance with high sodium content. While these products serve different primary purposes, they're often compared because both target active individuals seeking to optimize their health and performance. AG1 positions itself as a complete nutritional foundation, while LMNT focuses on the critical but specific need for proper electrolyte balance. Understanding their distinct formulations, benefits, and ideal use cases is essential for choosing the right supplement for your health optimization goals.
AG1 (Athletic Greens)
$99
LMNT
$45
[FEATURE COMPARISON]
| Feature | AG1 (Athletic Greens) | LMNT |
|---|---|---|
|
Primary Purpose The main health benefit and intended use case |
Complete nutritional foundation with 75 ingredients for overall health | Targeted electrolyte replenishment for hydration and performance |
|
Key Nutrients Most important active ingredients and their dosages |
Vitamins A, C, E, B-complex, probiotics, adaptogens, digestive enzymes | Sodium 1,000mg, Potassium 200mg, Magnesium 60mg per serving |
|
Sugar Content Amount of added sugars per serving |
2g total sugars from whole food sources | 0g sugar, sweetened with stevia only |
|
Ideal User Profile Who would benefit most from this supplement |
Health-conscious individuals with dietary gaps, busy professionals | Endurance athletes, heavy sweaters, hot climate workers |
|
Cost per Serving Price breakdown for daily use |
$3.30 per serving ($99/30 servings) | $1.50 per serving ($45/30 servings) |
|
Sodium Content Daily sodium intake from one serving |
Minimal sodium content (under 50mg) | 1,000mg sodium (43% of daily recommended value) |
|
Third-Party Testing Independent quality and safety verification |
NSF Certified for Sport, tested for 280+ banned substances | Third-party tested, manufactured at cGMP facilities |
[PROS & CONS]
AG1 (Athletic Greens)
Pros
- Comprehensive 75-ingredient formula covers multiple health areas
- NSF Certified for Sport with rigorous third-party testing
- Supports immune function, digestion, energy, and cognitive performance
- Contains probiotics, adaptogens, and digestive enzymes
- Convenient all-in-one daily nutrition solution
Cons
- Expensive at $99 per month ($3.30 per serving)
- Some ingredients may be underdosed due to formula complexity
- Contains 49 ingredients without disclosed amounts
- May be unnecessary for those with balanced diets
LMNT
Pros
- Scientifically formulated electrolyte ratios for athletes
- Zero sugar and artificial ingredients
- More affordable at $1.50 per serving
- Effective for high-intensity exercise and hot climates
- Simple, transparent ingredient list
Cons
- Extremely high sodium content (1,000mg) unsuitable for daily use
- Suboptimal 5:1 sodium-to-potassium ratio
- Limited to hydration benefits only
- May contribute to excessive daily sodium intake
- Very salty taste may be off-putting
[OUR VERDICT]
AG1 wins for comprehensive health optimization due to its broad nutritional profile, while LMNT excels for targeted athletic hydration needs.
AG1 and LMNT serve distinctly different purposes in a health optimization routine, making a direct comparison somewhat like comparing a multivitamin to a sports drink. AG1 excels as a comprehensive nutritional insurance policy, providing broad-spectrum micronutrients, probiotics, and adaptogens that can fill dietary gaps and support overall wellness. Its 75-ingredient formula is particularly valuable for individuals with busy lifestyles who struggle to maintain a perfectly balanced diet, though the $99 monthly cost represents a significant investment.
LMNT dominates in the specific arena of electrolyte replenishment, particularly for athletes and individuals with high sweat rates. Its 1,000mg sodium content aligns with actual sweat losses during intense exercise, making it scientifically sound for endurance athletes. However, dietitians express concern about the high sodium content for everyday users, especially those already consuming processed foods. The 5:1 sodium-to-potassium ratio is also suboptimal compared to the recommended 2:1 or 3:1 ratio.
For most BodyOS users seeking general health optimization, AG1 provides broader benefits despite the higher cost. Its comprehensive formula supports immune function, digestion, energy, and cognitive performance simultaneously. However, active individuals who sweat heavily or train intensely may benefit more from LMNT's targeted electrolyte profile. The ideal approach for serious athletes might involve using both products strategically - AG1 for daily nutritional foundation and LMNT specifically around training sessions.
Considering cost-effectiveness and versatility, AG1 emerges as the winner for general health optimization, while LMNT excels for specific athletic performance needs. Neither product is essential for individuals with balanced diets and moderate activity levels.
Our pick:
AG1 (Athletic Greens)
Track AG1 (Athletic Greens) and LMNT in BodyOS
Connect your devices to see unified insights in one place.
[RELATED COMPARISONS]
Supplements
Transparent Labs vs Legion Athletics: Complete Protein Powder Comparison Guide 2024
Transparent Labs wins with 28g protein per serving, superior taste, and better protein-to-calorie ratio, making it the premium choice for serious athletes.
Supplements
AG1 vs Ritual Multivitamin: Complete 2025 Supplement Comparison Guide
Ritual wins for targeted, science-backed nutrition at an excellent value, while AG1 excels for comprehensive health support despite the premium price.
Supplements
Thorne vs Pure Encapsulations: Complete Supplement Brand Comparison 2024
Pure Encapsulations wins for sensitive individuals seeking ultra-clean formulations, while Thorne excels for athletes and those needing flexible dosing options.